Cryip
  • Home
  • News
  • Research & Analysis
  • Reviews & Comparisons
  • Learn Crypto
  • Features
No Result
View All Result
Cryip
  • Home
  • News
  • Research & Analysis
  • Reviews & Comparisons
  • Learn Crypto
  • Features
No Result
View All Result
Cryip
No Result
View All Result
Home News Security & Hacks

Uniswap V4 Router04 Exploited: $42,100 Drained in On-Chain Attack

Uniswap V4 Router04 contract has resulted in a $42,100 theft on the Ethereum network. The exploit targeted permissions within the z0r0z.eth deployed contract, successfully draining assets from a victim’s wallet.

by Saravana Kumar Mahendran
March 3, 2026
in Security & Hacks
0 0
Uniswap V4 Router04 Exploited
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

An exploit in the Uniswap V4 Router04 contract on the Ethereum network has resulted in a loss of approximately $42,100. The breach, which involved a contract deployed by z0r0z.eth, has raised immediate concerns regarding the safety of experimental routing logic in the Uniswap V4 ecosystem. According to blockchain data, a specific vulnerability within the Router04 contract allowed unauthorized access to the victim’s funds, highlighting the inherent risks associated with early-stage “Hooks” and custom routers on the mainnet.

Uniswap V4 Router04 Exploited
Uniswap V4 Router04 Exploited

Attack Details (On-Chain Data):

Metric Details
Victim Address 0x65A8F07Bd9A8598E1b5B6C0a88F4779DBC077675
Network Ethereum Mainnet (ETH)
Assets Stolen ~21.19 ETH and USDC stablecoins
Estimated Loss $42,100 USD
Transaction Hash 0xfe34c4beee447de536bbd3d613aa0e3aa7eeb63832e9453e4ef3999924ab466a

Technical Deep Dive: How the Exploit Occurred

Security researchers believe the exploit was made possible through a flaw in how the Router04 contract handles user permissions and interactions with the Uniswap V4 Pool Manager.

  • Approval Exploitation: The victim had previously granted the Router04 contract permission (approval) to spend their tokens for swaps. In a standard scenario, the contract only moves funds as part of a legitimate user-initiated trade. However, the attacker identified a logical flaw that allowed them to “trigger” the contract into moving the victim’s funds to an external address controlled by the hacker.

  • Logical Call Flaw: Preliminary analysis suggests the router failed to properly validate the caller’s identity during specific function executions. By injecting a malicious “call,” the attacker tricked the router into thinking it was executing a valid swap, while it was actually draining the user’s wallet.

  • V4 Hook Complexity: The introduction of “Hooks” in Uniswap V4 allows for highly customizable trades, but it also increases the attack surface. In this instance, the interaction between the router’s logic and the pool’s state seems to have lacked the necessary “guardrails” to prevent unauthorized fund withdrawals.

A Crucial Lesson in “Security Hygiene”

This incident serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of “Unlimited Approvals.” In the DeFi world, most users grant contracts permission to spend an infinite amount of a specific token to simplify future trades. However, if that contract—or a router connected to it is compromised, hackers can drain every token associated with that approval.

To mitigate such risks, technical experts recommend a “Limited Approval” approach: only granting permission for the exact amount of a single transaction. Furthermore, users are urged to use tools like Revoke.cash or Etherscan’s approval checker to regularly clear out old or unnecessary permissions, ensuring that even if a contract is exploited in the future, their assets remain out of reach.

This exploit is part of a growing trend of DeFi vulnerabilities; for instance, the February 2026 crypto security report highlights that over $23 million was lost across various incidents last month alone. Staying informed about these recurring threats is the first step toward maintaining a secure on-chain presence.

Disclaimer: Cryip is an independent media and research outlet providing news, data, and analysis on the cryptocurrency industry. Content is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, tax, or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile and past performance is not indicative of future results. References to specific assets, platforms, or incidents are for journalistic purposes only and do not imply endorsement, and readers assume full responsibility for their decisions.
Tags: Crypto Hacks

Related Posts

SubQuery Staking Contract Exploit
Security & Hacks

SubQuery Staking Contract Exploit Triggers Withdrawals Pause

by Saravana Kumar Mahendran
April 13, 2026

SubQuery Network confirmed that its staking contract was exploited, resulting in the loss of approximately 129 million SQT tokens. The...

Read moreDetails
Weekly Crypto Market Overview April 06 – 12, 2026

Weekly Crypto Market Overview: April 06 – 12, 2026

April 13, 2026
Zerion Web App Shutdown

Zerion Web App Shutdown After Abnormal Activity, Funds Confirmed Safe

April 11, 2026
Aethir Hack

Aethir Hack Contained: Initial $423K Loss Revised to Under $90K After Swift Response

April 10, 2026
Hyperliquid Suicide Liquidation $FARTCOIN Perpetual Attack Drains $1.5M from HLP Vault

Hyperliquid Suicide Liquidation: FARTCOIN Perpetual Attack Drains $1.5M from HLP Vault

April 9, 2026
Bitcoin Depot Reports $3.6M Crypto Theft in Cyber Breach

Bitcoin Depot Reports $3.6M Crypto Theft in Cyber Breach

April 9, 2026
ZachXBT Exposes DPRK Crypto Payment

ZachXBT Exposes DPRK Crypto Payment Network Processing $3.5M in Illicit Remittances

April 9, 2026
Next Post
Five Bells Raises Seed Round to Build Bitcoin-Based Post-Trade Infrastructure

Five Bells Raises Seed Round to Build Bitcoin-Based Post-Trade Infrastructure

Cryip focuses on crypto research and on-chain analysis, supported by coverage of markets, regulation, security events, and blockchain ecosystems.

Recent Posts

  • Crypto and Web3 Fundraising Report (Apr 06–12, 2026): $77.7M Raised in 14 Deals
  • Blockchain On-Chain Metrics: Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BSC, Tron & Base Weekly Report (April 06 – 12, 2026)
  • SubQuery Staking Contract Exploit Triggers Withdrawals Pause

Categories

  • AI × Crypto
  • Data & Dashboards
  • Market Updates
  • On-Chain Analysis
  • OpSec
  • Policy & Regulation
  • Post Mortems
  • Reports
  • Scams & Fraud
  • Security & Hacks
  • Stablecoins
  • Tokenomics
  • VC & Funding

Company

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Editorial Standards & Integrity
  • Our Team
  • Privacy Policy
  • Review Methodology
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Trust, Disclosures & Independence

© 2026 Cryip - Research-Driven Crypto Analysis & News by Hashlays.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Research & Analysis
  • Reviews & Comparisons
  • Learn Crypto
  • Features

© 2026 Cryip - Research-Driven Crypto Analysis & News by Hashlays.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.